<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chargeback Fraud &#8211; Customer Caught Red Handed (Finally!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2010/07/13/chargeback-fraud-customer-caught-red-handed-finally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2010/07/13/chargeback-fraud-customer-caught-red-handed-finally/</link>
	<description>Musings of a Balding 29 Year Old Business Owner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2010/07/13/chargeback-fraud-customer-caught-red-handed-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-7796</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=1748#comment-7796</guid>
		<description>Rich - thanks for posting that.  I agree:  sigh.  I&#039;d like to believe that something like BadCustomer could be done legitimately, maybe by the government or as an open source project, but who knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich &#8211; thanks for posting that.  I agree:  sigh.  I&#8217;d like to believe that something like BadCustomer could be done legitimately, maybe by the government or as an open source project, but who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Ghost Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2010/07/13/chargeback-fraud-customer-caught-red-handed-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-7795</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Ghost Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=1748#comment-7795</guid>
		<description>And, perhaps unsurprisingly...badcustomer.com itself turns out to be...a giant credit card scam.
http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/bad-customer-i-works-scam-enforcer-busted-ftc-1282.php

Makes me really wonder if I can trust anyone these days (sigh).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, perhaps unsurprisingly&#8230;badcustomer.com itself turns out to be&#8230;a giant credit card scam.<br />
<a href="http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/bad-customer-i-works-scam-enforcer-busted-ftc-1282.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/bad-customer-i-works-scam-enforcer-busted-ftc-1282.php</a></p>
<p>Makes me really wonder if I can trust anyone these days (sigh).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2010/07/13/chargeback-fraud-customer-caught-red-handed-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-6411</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=1748#comment-6411</guid>
		<description>No idea. Suppose you&#039;d call your merchant account provider and ask them about 3D-Secure (umbrella term) or Mastercard securecode / Verified by Visa (brand names).

Please do let us know how you get on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No idea. Suppose you&#8217;d call your merchant account provider and ask them about 3D-Secure (umbrella term) or Mastercard securecode / Verified by Visa (brand names).</p>
<p>Please do let us know how you get on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r-merchant</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2010/07/13/chargeback-fraud-customer-caught-red-handed-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-6404</link>
		<dc:creator>r-merchant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=1748#comment-6404</guid>
		<description>This is very promising. If one already has the merchant account, what is the quickest way to get setup with this program?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very promising. If one already has the merchant account, what is the quickest way to get setup with this program?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2010/07/13/chargeback-fraud-customer-caught-red-handed-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-6401</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=1748#comment-6401</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;m surprised it&#039;s not integrated better with the shopping carts themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;m surprised it&#8217;s not integrated better with the shopping carts themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2010/07/13/chargeback-fraud-customer-caught-red-handed-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-6400</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=1748#comment-6400</guid>
		<description>Yeah fingers crossed! I see no reason it shouldn&#039;t be adopted there. I was pretty surprised when you hadn&#039;t heard of it, given that both backers are American companies! Maybe they&#039;re testing it on us Guinea pigs first?

Tis stupid that its on a different domain/frame and asks for your full password rather than just a few characters though. That&#039;s totally against everything we&#039;re taught as web consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah fingers crossed! I see no reason it shouldn&#8217;t be adopted there. I was pretty surprised when you hadn&#8217;t heard of it, given that both backers are American companies! Maybe they&#8217;re testing it on us Guinea pigs first?</p>
<p>Tis stupid that its on a different domain/frame and asks for your full password rather than just a few characters though. That&#8217;s totally against everything we&#8217;re taught as web consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2010/07/13/chargeback-fraud-customer-caught-red-handed-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-6397</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=1748#comment-6397</guid>
		<description>Great video Rob.  Thanks for sharing.  It&#039;s very interesting how the bank refused to refund a purchase that was &quot;verified by Visa&quot;.  Like you said, for legit merchants this seems like a great thing.  I wonder if this will ever be adopted more commonly in the US? Seems like it could cut down on fraudulent claims by quite a bit.  Customers would be less likely to threaten &quot;chargeback blackmail&quot; if they knew the transaction was &quot;verified&quot; and they had almost no chance of getting the charge reversed...as compared to now when it seems you can basically have any charge reversed with a quick phone call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video Rob.  Thanks for sharing.  It&#8217;s very interesting how the bank refused to refund a purchase that was &#8220;verified by Visa&#8221;.  Like you said, for legit merchants this seems like a great thing.  I wonder if this will ever be adopted more commonly in the US? Seems like it could cut down on fraudulent claims by quite a bit.  Customers would be less likely to threaten &#8220;chargeback blackmail&#8221; if they knew the transaction was &#8220;verified&#8221; and they had almost no chance of getting the charge reversed&#8230;as compared to now when it seems you can basically have any charge reversed with a quick phone call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2010/07/13/chargeback-fraud-customer-caught-red-handed-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-6391</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=1748#comment-6391</guid>
		<description>A little more on this - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11571766

Shows it can be worrying for the user as the security is on in a new frame/page, and of course there&#039;s always opportunities for scam artists to replicate pages. However, about 2 minutes in you&#039;ll notice them saying that Visa flat out would not process a refund for her. For legitimate merchants this is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little more on this &#8211; <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11571766" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11571766</a></p>
<p>Shows it can be worrying for the user as the security is on in a new frame/page, and of course there&#8217;s always opportunities for scam artists to replicate pages. However, about 2 minutes in you&#8217;ll notice them saying that Visa flat out would not process a refund for her. For legitimate merchants this is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2010/07/13/chargeback-fraud-customer-caught-red-handed-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-6346</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=1748#comment-6346</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all of the info Dave &amp; Rob.  I find it interesting that banks are now trying to alleviate themselves of the liability.  I think part of the reason we have a chargeback problem is that banks have made it so easy to do so (and advertised as much)...if they make it harder, as they should, I *think* it will have a positive impact on merchants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all of the info Dave &#038; Rob.  I find it interesting that banks are now trying to alleviate themselves of the liability.  I think part of the reason we have a chargeback problem is that banks have made it so easy to do so (and advertised as much)&#8230;if they make it harder, as they should, I *think* it will have a positive impact on merchants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2010/07/13/chargeback-fraud-customer-caught-red-handed-finally/comment-page-1/#comment-6345</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=1748#comment-6345</guid>
		<description>Ah, didn&#039;t realise that. What with Mastercard and Visa being the driving force and them being American companies I&#039;d expect that it is there/is coming there. We&#039;ve had it about 2 years. 

From a customer standpoint, the first time you use it you have to set up an account with visa/mastercard. It asks you for your DOB, various account numbers etc. and gets you to set up a challenge code and response. When you come to use it, you begin the checkout process as normal from a merchant, then in the last stage you&#039;re redirected to a verified by visa site (either a redirect or an iframe) and you see your own challenge code (to prove it&#039;s legit) and give it your password. Then it sends you back to the merchant and confirms the sale. 

From what I can find out from reading, the merchant doesn&#039;t face any risk of chargeback, presumably because the customer entered their password. The customer is also absolved of fraud risk through phishing. 

As for the actual implementation, I think paypal payments pro/payflow can integrate 3D-secure. The set up is a bit messy from the customer perspective (having to enter your DOB the first time, having to enter your WHOLE password when asked... it&#039;s completely against all the security advice we&#039;re given as consumers), however, it&#039;s become a trusted and known brand and people on the whole seem to get on with it. Only problem for me is that I&#039;m always forgetting my password, getting it wrong 3 times, then having to reset it... it won&#039;t let you use the same password as before either, so it&#039;s a continuing problem (for me at least!). Doesn&#039;t put me or anyone I know off purchasing though - I feel better using it than not, because of the feeling of added security. 

Dunno if I mentioned before, but lots of banks here are now giving away security software and anti-phishing software free. HSBC&#039;s &quot;rapport&quot; software seems quite good. Reading the smallprint of my account, if I&#039;m a victim of fraud and I&#039;ve made purchases online without anti-spyware etc. and without mastercard securecode/verified by visa, I may be liable for the loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, didn&#8217;t realise that. What with Mastercard and Visa being the driving force and them being American companies I&#8217;d expect that it is there/is coming there. We&#8217;ve had it about 2 years. </p>
<p>From a customer standpoint, the first time you use it you have to set up an account with visa/mastercard. It asks you for your DOB, various account numbers etc. and gets you to set up a challenge code and response. When you come to use it, you begin the checkout process as normal from a merchant, then in the last stage you&#8217;re redirected to a verified by visa site (either a redirect or an iframe) and you see your own challenge code (to prove it&#8217;s legit) and give it your password. Then it sends you back to the merchant and confirms the sale. </p>
<p>From what I can find out from reading, the merchant doesn&#8217;t face any risk of chargeback, presumably because the customer entered their password. The customer is also absolved of fraud risk through phishing. </p>
<p>As for the actual implementation, I think paypal payments pro/payflow can integrate 3D-secure. The set up is a bit messy from the customer perspective (having to enter your DOB the first time, having to enter your WHOLE password when asked&#8230; it&#8217;s completely against all the security advice we&#8217;re given as consumers), however, it&#8217;s become a trusted and known brand and people on the whole seem to get on with it. Only problem for me is that I&#8217;m always forgetting my password, getting it wrong 3 times, then having to reset it&#8230; it won&#8217;t let you use the same password as before either, so it&#8217;s a continuing problem (for me at least!). Doesn&#8217;t put me or anyone I know off purchasing though &#8211; I feel better using it than not, because of the feeling of added security. </p>
<p>Dunno if I mentioned before, but lots of banks here are now giving away security software and anti-phishing software free. HSBC&#8217;s &#8220;rapport&#8221; software seems quite good. Reading the smallprint of my account, if I&#8217;m a victim of fraud and I&#8217;ve made purchases online without anti-spyware etc. and without mastercard securecode/verified by visa, I may be liable for the loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

