<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hiring Within Your Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2009/09/22/hiring-within-your-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2009/09/22/hiring-within-your-network/</link>
	<description>Musings of a Balding 29 Year Old Business Owner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our First Full-Time Employee Started Today &#124; Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2009/09/22/hiring-within-your-network/comment-page-1/#comment-6122</link>
		<dc:creator>Our First Full-Time Employee Started Today &#124; Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=761#comment-6122</guid>
		<description>[...] is warehouse manager, and the guy is Charlie, who has been with us on a part-time basis for just about year now. Through his consistent hard work he&#8217;s proven beyond a doubt to us that he&#8217;s the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is warehouse manager, and the guy is Charlie, who has been with us on a part-time basis for just about year now. Through his consistent hard work he&#8217;s proven beyond a doubt to us that he&#8217;s the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2009/09/22/hiring-within-your-network/comment-page-1/#comment-4170</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=761#comment-4170</guid>
		<description>Rob that&#039;s a great story.  Thanks for sharing.  It gives me hope that we can continue to hire this way as we grow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob that&#8217;s a great story.  Thanks for sharing.  It gives me hope that we can continue to hire this way as we grow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2009/09/22/hiring-within-your-network/comment-page-1/#comment-4166</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=761#comment-4166</guid>
		<description>I was re-reading this post of yours earlier, and it&#039;s so right.

We&#039;ve just had the most awesome couple of days in terms of staff and something one of our staff told me today thrilled me to the core. We&#039;ve now got 26 part-time staff based around the country that we work with, some we work with a lot, others not so much. We&#039;ve become pretty good at training them to do the compartmentalised, production line type tasks we need doing and while we value them highly individually they are mostly quite interchangeable, because that&#039;s the way we intended things to be. A couple of days ago we needed some help in a hurry. I put the word out with my guys and they came up with someone. They have checked his skills, taught him our procedures and trained him very well. I have not yet met this person!

Because I trust the judgement of my staff (almost all are from within networks, a few from online job ads.) and have built solid, simple procedures we&#039;re able to do stunning things like this. I can&#039;t wait to see what&#039;s next (I&#039;m also looking forward to meeting the newest member of the team!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was re-reading this post of yours earlier, and it&#8217;s so right.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve just had the most awesome couple of days in terms of staff and something one of our staff told me today thrilled me to the core. We&#8217;ve now got 26 part-time staff based around the country that we work with, some we work with a lot, others not so much. We&#8217;ve become pretty good at training them to do the compartmentalised, production line type tasks we need doing and while we value them highly individually they are mostly quite interchangeable, because that&#8217;s the way we intended things to be. A couple of days ago we needed some help in a hurry. I put the word out with my guys and they came up with someone. They have checked his skills, taught him our procedures and trained him very well. I have not yet met this person!</p>
<p>Because I trust the judgement of my staff (almost all are from within networks, a few from online job ads.) and have built solid, simple procedures we&#8217;re able to do stunning things like this. I can&#8217;t wait to see what&#8217;s next (I&#8217;m also looking forward to meeting the newest member of the team!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2009/09/22/hiring-within-your-network/comment-page-1/#comment-3503</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=761#comment-3503</guid>
		<description>Leigh -

Sorry to hear about your experience with the virtual assistant. I have never hired one.  The closest I came was hiring a company in India to do a small amount of Craigslist marketing for us, and that didn&#039;t go very well.  I do hope to outsource more mundane tasks in the future because you can get so much for your money, but as you pointed out there are trade-offs. 

I guess I&#039;d just take a similar approach - try to find a referral to a company that people have had success with and start by giving them a few small test projects.  Also, read 4 Hour Work Week if you haven&#039;t.  Tim Ferriss breaks down in quite a bit of detail what worked for him and what didn&#039;t.

Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leigh -</p>
<p>Sorry to hear about your experience with the virtual assistant. I have never hired one.  The closest I came was hiring a company in India to do a small amount of Craigslist marketing for us, and that didn&#8217;t go very well.  I do hope to outsource more mundane tasks in the future because you can get so much for your money, but as you pointed out there are trade-offs. </p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;d just take a similar approach &#8211; try to find a referral to a company that people have had success with and start by giving them a few small test projects.  Also, read 4 Hour Work Week if you haven&#8217;t.  Tim Ferriss breaks down in quite a bit of detail what worked for him and what didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2009/09/22/hiring-within-your-network/comment-page-1/#comment-3499</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=761#comment-3499</guid>
		<description>Adam:

Great points about the hiring process.  I&#039;m curious as to whether you&#039;ve ever hired a &quot;virtual&quot; employee, like a programmer or virtual assistant.  I hired a virtual assistant last year, and it was a total disaster.  I had to chase her down to get updates on assignments and she dragged things out so she could bill me for more time.  It was more work for me to chase after her than it would have been for me to just do the work myself.  I&#039;m wondering if there&#039;s a good process for evaluating people for virtual positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam:</p>
<p>Great points about the hiring process.  I&#8217;m curious as to whether you&#8217;ve ever hired a &#8220;virtual&#8221; employee, like a programmer or virtual assistant.  I hired a virtual assistant last year, and it was a total disaster.  I had to chase her down to get updates on assignments and she dragged things out so she could bill me for more time.  It was more work for me to chase after her than it would have been for me to just do the work myself.  I&#8217;m wondering if there&#8217;s a good process for evaluating people for virtual positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nethy</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2009/09/22/hiring-within-your-network/comment-page-1/#comment-3384</link>
		<dc:creator>nethy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=761#comment-3384</guid>
		<description>good answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2009/09/22/hiring-within-your-network/comment-page-1/#comment-3379</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=761#comment-3379</guid>
		<description>Great story Tim.  Sometimes it&#039;s easy to overlook that PEOPLE are why we&#039;re all in business.  If you don&#039;t make someone&#039;s life better, your business will fail.  If you can&#039;t build a team that works well together, your business will fail.  On a grander level, developing and maintaining relationships are a large part of happiness in life (at least personally and based upon happiness studies I&#039;ve read).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great story Tim.  Sometimes it&#8217;s easy to overlook that PEOPLE are why we&#8217;re all in business.  If you don&#8217;t make someone&#8217;s life better, your business will fail.  If you can&#8217;t build a team that works well together, your business will fail.  On a grander level, developing and maintaining relationships are a large part of happiness in life (at least personally and based upon happiness studies I&#8217;ve read).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2009/09/22/hiring-within-your-network/comment-page-1/#comment-3377</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=761#comment-3377</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame you can not plaster this on billboards across the nation, so many people miss the point on establishing and maintaining a network. Everything I have ever done or accomplished in my life has involved people and for better or worse relationships are formed with every interaction I have with individuals - isn&#039;t that a grand theory! Even though this concept is so obvious you would be shocked how many people simply miss the boat and spend time surfing Monster, and other career sites, if they knew the facts maybe they would maintain and develop a solid network. Roughly five years ago, I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s been tracked more recently, but career placement sites like that accounted for just under 20% of all new hires when the facts were looked at. Don&#039;t get me wrong 20% is not bad, but it&#039;s not your best bet either, working with people you&#039;ve met in the past is a much better avenue to explore so you don&#039;t get lost in the sift. 

I cannot stress the importance of developing a network, it takes very little effort to maintain and can yield unbelievable results. I learned a trick from a great salesman I used to deal with, he passed away a few years ago and one way I like to maintain his legacy is to share one of the tricks he shared with me about how he was so good at what he did. Bare in mind this was about 15 years ago, he kept index cards in his car about everyone he talked to, names, interests, things they mentioned, any detail about the individual he  thought was worth noting and he would review the appropriate index cards before he stopped at any account. He was enormously successful and made it look effortless, despite him passing away roughly 7 years ago I still have fond memories of how he created a highly organized system that resembles the internet only with paper and a pen. He was never at a loss of finding the right people for the right task, his cards were very organized and easy to interpret. 

In other words, as I ALWAYS preach, one of the primary pillars of successful business: People deal with people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame you can not plaster this on billboards across the nation, so many people miss the point on establishing and maintaining a network. Everything I have ever done or accomplished in my life has involved people and for better or worse relationships are formed with every interaction I have with individuals &#8211; isn&#8217;t that a grand theory! Even though this concept is so obvious you would be shocked how many people simply miss the boat and spend time surfing Monster, and other career sites, if they knew the facts maybe they would maintain and develop a solid network. Roughly five years ago, I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s been tracked more recently, but career placement sites like that accounted for just under 20% of all new hires when the facts were looked at. Don&#8217;t get me wrong 20% is not bad, but it&#8217;s not your best bet either, working with people you&#8217;ve met in the past is a much better avenue to explore so you don&#8217;t get lost in the sift. </p>
<p>I cannot stress the importance of developing a network, it takes very little effort to maintain and can yield unbelievable results. I learned a trick from a great salesman I used to deal with, he passed away a few years ago and one way I like to maintain his legacy is to share one of the tricks he shared with me about how he was so good at what he did. Bare in mind this was about 15 years ago, he kept index cards in his car about everyone he talked to, names, interests, things they mentioned, any detail about the individual he  thought was worth noting and he would review the appropriate index cards before he stopped at any account. He was enormously successful and made it look effortless, despite him passing away roughly 7 years ago I still have fond memories of how he created a highly organized system that resembles the internet only with paper and a pen. He was never at a loss of finding the right people for the right task, his cards were very organized and easy to interpret. </p>
<p>In other words, as I ALWAYS preach, one of the primary pillars of successful business: People deal with people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2009/09/22/hiring-within-your-network/comment-page-1/#comment-3376</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=761#comment-3376</guid>
		<description>Nice questions Nethy :)

I&#039;m not 100% sure how my partners would answer, but I do think they mostly agree with me.  I think they definitely agree with me on the priorities of hiring.  Right now we&#039;re all just entrenched in too much day to day crap and I think that any successful business owner wants to remove themselves from all of the work that they don&#039;t have to do.

Programming wise, there&#039;s only probably a year left of real important improvements to make.  After that, the core e-commerce stuff doesn&#039;t require full time attention.  I think with a few new major features a year and we&#039;ll be able to stay ahead of the competition.  That leaves me with maybe 60% of my time to work on other stuff.

I think we all agree that we don&#039;t have the resources (time &amp; money) to enter into another retail venture any time soon.  So logically I think we&#039;ll morph a little more into a web company.  Then again, I think that&#039;s really speculating at this point because it&#039;s 1 year+ away. A lot can change in that time.

As far as your second question, I think I would try to eliminate chargeback fraud.  I&#039;d try to build a network of retailers who paid a fee to access an API to check if a customer has previously done something fraudulent on another website.  It would be a huge undertaking - you&#039;d need programmers to build plugins for all of the major shopping carts, you&#039;d need a massive amount of retailers to buy into the system to make it work, and you&#039;d need a way to categorize each fraud correctly so that one minor miscommunication wouldn&#039;t blacklist a customer for life.  It&#039;d be a big challenge with a lot of things to overcome, but it&#039;s something I have experience in and am passionate about, plus it&#039;s improving the web for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice questions Nethy <img src='http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not 100% sure how my partners would answer, but I do think they mostly agree with me.  I think they definitely agree with me on the priorities of hiring.  Right now we&#8217;re all just entrenched in too much day to day crap and I think that any successful business owner wants to remove themselves from all of the work that they don&#8217;t have to do.</p>
<p>Programming wise, there&#8217;s only probably a year left of real important improvements to make.  After that, the core e-commerce stuff doesn&#8217;t require full time attention.  I think with a few new major features a year and we&#8217;ll be able to stay ahead of the competition.  That leaves me with maybe 60% of my time to work on other stuff.</p>
<p>I think we all agree that we don&#8217;t have the resources (time &#038; money) to enter into another retail venture any time soon.  So logically I think we&#8217;ll morph a little more into a web company.  Then again, I think that&#8217;s really speculating at this point because it&#8217;s 1 year+ away. A lot can change in that time.</p>
<p>As far as your second question, I think I would try to eliminate chargeback fraud.  I&#8217;d try to build a network of retailers who paid a fee to access an API to check if a customer has previously done something fraudulent on another website.  It would be a huge undertaking &#8211; you&#8217;d need programmers to build plugins for all of the major shopping carts, you&#8217;d need a massive amount of retailers to buy into the system to make it work, and you&#8217;d need a way to categorize each fraud correctly so that one minor miscommunication wouldn&#8217;t blacklist a customer for life.  It&#8217;d be a big challenge with a lot of things to overcome, but it&#8217;s something I have experience in and am passionate about, plus it&#8217;s improving the web for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nethy</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2009/09/22/hiring-within-your-network/comment-page-1/#comment-3372</link>
		<dc:creator>nethy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/?p=761#comment-3372</guid>
		<description>Adam, it sounds like you see your company as a web company, rather then a retailer. It sounds like you want DI on autopilot as much as possible and then go start different sites. Is that mostly your take (you are the programmer, after all) or is it the whole team&#039;s? If you put that question or some other question that hints at how they see the company would you get similar answers?

Can I try another one? If you were going to introduce one big risky project with a chance of being a huge success but a bigger chance of being a substantial failure, what kind of things would you consider?

Sorry to psychoanalyse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, it sounds like you see your company as a web company, rather then a retailer. It sounds like you want DI on autopilot as much as possible and then go start different sites. Is that mostly your take (you are the programmer, after all) or is it the whole team&#8217;s? If you put that question or some other question that hints at how they see the company would you get similar answers?</p>
<p>Can I try another one? If you were going to introduce one big risky project with a chance of being a huge success but a bigger chance of being a substantial failure, what kind of things would you consider?</p>
<p>Sorry to psychoanalyse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

