<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using the Open Source Alternatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/</link>
	<description>Musings of a Balding 29 Year Old Business Owner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hello Songbird, Goodbye iTunes - Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>Hello Songbird, Goodbye iTunes - Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>[...] highly customizable software that is equal to or better than the commercial alternatives.  As I wrote in a post last year, our company uses almost all open source software, both because of the affordability and because of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] highly customizable software that is equal to or better than the commercial alternatives.  As I wrote in a post last year, our company uses almost all open source software, both because of the affordability and because of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becoming a Web Based Company - Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Becoming a Web Based Company - Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/#comment-723</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve been realizing just how fast technology changes. In December I wrote an article about our company embracing the open source software alternatives: So we came up with a plan. We would have a set of desktop workstations (one to start) that have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve been realizing just how fast technology changes. In December I wrote an article about our company embracing the open source software alternatives: So we came up with a plan. We would have a set of desktop workstations (one to start) that have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Anthony,

It&#039;s been brewing in my head the past few days, and I think we might consider doing it for just our Pure Adapt emails for that reason:  we had a few minor server issues this week and it got me thinking about how nice it would be to separate some of our email hosting.  I&#039;m going to talk it over with the guys....

You&#039;re right, the phone compatibility is huge for the general entrepreneur.  For whatever reason we&#039;ve all kind of avoided it and since none of us anticipate traveling a ton I *think* the culture we want to instill is &quot;if you&#039;re away from work don&#039;t think about work&quot;.  Of course, that could always change :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been brewing in my head the past few days, and I think we might consider doing it for just our Pure Adapt emails for that reason:  we had a few minor server issues this week and it got me thinking about how nice it would be to separate some of our email hosting.  I&#8217;m going to talk it over with the guys&#8230;.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, the phone compatibility is huge for the general entrepreneur.  For whatever reason we&#8217;ve all kind of avoided it and since none of us anticipate traveling a ton I *think* the culture we want to instill is &#8220;if you&#8217;re away from work don&#8217;t think about work&#8221;.  Of course, that could always change <img src='http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Ah, I see, that makes sense. But I do think that for most entrepreneurs in a more &quot;normal&quot; situation - ie. 1 domain, not a ton of existing systems already in place, the need to check mail from multiple computers or any one of the dozens of internet phones that are cheaper and more common these days - Google Apps is definitely the way to go in combination with or instead of Thunderbird.

Another thing that I forgot to mention in my last email - a good case for Google Apps is separation of powers. By allowing Google to host, that means your email is up if your web server is down. That&#039;s a huge plus for any internet entrepreneur, I believe.

... And phone compatibility, I think, is a big thing. I understand that it doesn&#039;t affect you personally, but I believe you&#039;re starting to reach the minority on that count. In my opinion, phone incompatibility is a big downside to using Thunderbird over Outlook or Google Apps - no official/solid support for mobility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I see, that makes sense. But I do think that for most entrepreneurs in a more &#8220;normal&#8221; situation &#8211; ie. 1 domain, not a ton of existing systems already in place, the need to check mail from multiple computers or any one of the dozens of internet phones that are cheaper and more common these days &#8211; Google Apps is definitely the way to go in combination with or instead of Thunderbird.</p>
<p>Another thing that I forgot to mention in my last email &#8211; a good case for Google Apps is separation of powers. By allowing Google to host, that means your email is up if your web server is down. That&#8217;s a huge plus for any internet entrepreneur, I believe.</p>
<p>&#8230; And phone compatibility, I think, is a big thing. I understand that it doesn&#8217;t affect you personally, but I believe you&#8217;re starting to reach the minority on that count. In my opinion, phone incompatibility is a big downside to using Thunderbird over Outlook or Google Apps &#8211; no official/solid support for mobility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve looked into it before, and I&#039;m not really sure how it benefits US.  

Since we&#039;re receiving email on a whole bunch of domains (PureAdapt, SportsLizard, DetailedImage, etc) it doesn&#039;t make sense to move every domain we receive email on over to it.  I think that would just confuse things.  In which case we&#039;d probably only do Pure Adapt, which is probably 35% of my email so I&#039;m not sure how much it helps.  I could see it solely as a collaboration tool for the owners, but we don&#039;t do much collaboration or scheduling together...the only collaboration I can think of is the Wiki and our web-based project management system (which could probably be replaced by a shared spreadsheet had this been in place a year ago when I built the system).

And while the backup is nice, we&#039;ve got our server backup, local backups, and now Mozy taking care of that so I&#039;d like to think we&#039;re in pretty good shape.

Plus I don&#039;t think any of the four of us have ever checked our email remotely (without our laptops of course).  We&#039;ve got webmail on our server, but I take my laptop everywhere I work...and when I&#039;m not working I want nothing to do with work emails.  No one has a smart phone or anything at the moment.

Not saying it&#039;s not a great solution...just that I&#039;m having trouble seeing how it helps us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve looked into it before, and I&#8217;m not really sure how it benefits US.  </p>
<p>Since we&#8217;re receiving email on a whole bunch of domains (PureAdapt, SportsLizard, DetailedImage, etc) it doesn&#8217;t make sense to move every domain we receive email on over to it.  I think that would just confuse things.  In which case we&#8217;d probably only do Pure Adapt, which is probably 35% of my email so I&#8217;m not sure how much it helps.  I could see it solely as a collaboration tool for the owners, but we don&#8217;t do much collaboration or scheduling together&#8230;the only collaboration I can think of is the Wiki and our web-based project management system (which could probably be replaced by a shared spreadsheet had this been in place a year ago when I built the system).</p>
<p>And while the backup is nice, we&#8217;ve got our server backup, local backups, and now Mozy taking care of that so I&#8217;d like to think we&#8217;re in pretty good shape.</p>
<p>Plus I don&#8217;t think any of the four of us have ever checked our email remotely (without our laptops of course).  We&#8217;ve got webmail on our server, but I take my laptop everywhere I work&#8230;and when I&#8217;m not working I want nothing to do with work emails.  No one has a smart phone or anything at the moment.</p>
<p>Not saying it&#8217;s not a great solution&#8230;just that I&#8217;m having trouble seeing how it helps us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Yeah, well, I wasn&#039;t in love with Gmail either, which is why I switched to it only for searchability &amp; remote access. After a while of using Gmail, I actually realized that it was just as good, if not better, than Outlook or any open source equivalent.

Also, in case the point was missed in the shuffle, Google Apps are a newer level of the consumer-level Google interfaces. Google Apps allow you to use your own domain name with the Gmail interface and whatnot. They also, for a very small fee, offer offsite backup solutions &amp; much more. By switching to Google Apps, you take the pressure/expense of email hosting off yourself and hand it over to Google. And in addition, you get the added benefit of the Gmail interface &amp; collaboration tools at your fingertips.

I&#039;d strongly suggest moving over to it, as you can keep your IMAP/POP email exactly the same as before (using Thunderbird, in your case), but with added benefits such as: Gmail for searchability &amp; remote access (for example, this works great when using a smartphone to access the mobile Gmail interface), shared calendar within your domain so you can see your partners&#039; schedules and provide them with your&#039;s, a centralized place for simple documents (for example, I use a basic shared spreadsheet as a support log, so that any employee can enter in a log of support hours for the day without the need for a bloated PHP/database-centric solution), and much more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, well, I wasn&#8217;t in love with Gmail either, which is why I switched to it only for searchability &amp; remote access. After a while of using Gmail, I actually realized that it was just as good, if not better, than Outlook or any open source equivalent.</p>
<p>Also, in case the point was missed in the shuffle, Google Apps are a newer level of the consumer-level Google interfaces. Google Apps allow you to use your own domain name with the Gmail interface and whatnot. They also, for a very small fee, offer offsite backup solutions &amp; much more. By switching to Google Apps, you take the pressure/expense of email hosting off yourself and hand it over to Google. And in addition, you get the added benefit of the Gmail interface &amp; collaboration tools at your fingertips.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d strongly suggest moving over to it, as you can keep your IMAP/POP email exactly the same as before (using Thunderbird, in your case), but with added benefits such as: Gmail for searchability &amp; remote access (for example, this works great when using a smartphone to access the mobile Gmail interface), shared calendar within your domain so you can see your partners&#8217; schedules and provide them with your&#8217;s, a centralized place for simple documents (for example, I use a basic shared spreadsheet as a support log, so that any employee can enter in a log of support hours for the day without the need for a bloated PHP/database-centric solution), and much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Good pts Anthony - you touched on something I didn&#039;t even mention:  web based software.  I&#039;m pretty sure that&#039;s where going with the OSALT will lead us, because it&#039;s definitely the future.  

Personally, I&#039;m not in love with Gmail, but if my partners are then they should definitely use it instead of Thunderbird...and with Google Doc&#039;s I&#039;m always conflicted between that and Zoho and other options and I&#039;m kind of waiting for a winner to emerge with the most robust features.  It&#039;s all so new, and either way we&#039;ll still prb have OO installed because there are occasions when you don&#039;t have web access and still want to work, and because (at least right now) the feature sets for the web based stuff isn&#039;t up to par with OO.

I also didn&#039;t mention that we&#039;re using Mozy to automatically remotely back up files http://mozy.com/, which works great so you can access your files anywhere.

My hope is that the future of PC&#039;s is more like Zonbu http://www.zonbu.com/home/index.htm where you don&#039;t pay for software at all - you just pay a subscription fee and they update software and backup files for you automatically.  I want to get a Zonbu (seems so cool to me), I just don&#039;t know what to use it for at this pt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good pts Anthony &#8211; you touched on something I didn&#8217;t even mention:  web based software.  I&#8217;m pretty sure that&#8217;s where going with the OSALT will lead us, because it&#8217;s definitely the future.  </p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m not in love with Gmail, but if my partners are then they should definitely use it instead of Thunderbird&#8230;and with Google Doc&#8217;s I&#8217;m always conflicted between that and Zoho and other options and I&#8217;m kind of waiting for a winner to emerge with the most robust features.  It&#8217;s all so new, and either way we&#8217;ll still prb have OO installed because there are occasions when you don&#8217;t have web access and still want to work, and because (at least right now) the feature sets for the web based stuff isn&#8217;t up to par with OO.</p>
<p>I also didn&#8217;t mention that we&#8217;re using Mozy to automatically remotely back up files <a href="http://mozy.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mozy.com/</a>, which works great so you can access your files anywhere.</p>
<p>My hope is that the future of PC&#8217;s is more like Zonbu <a href="http://www.zonbu.com/home/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.zonbu.com/home/index.htm</a> where you don&#8217;t pay for software at all &#8211; you just pay a subscription fee and they update software and backup files for you automatically.  I want to get a Zonbu (seems so cool to me), I just don&#8217;t know what to use it for at this pt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adam-mcfarland.net/2007/12/09/using-the-open-source-alternatives/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>This is a great article and all very true. To go a step further - you mentioned Thunderbird. However, about a month ago, I switched my entire domain name to Google Apps:
https://www.google.com/a/
The goal was to use Outlook with IMAP, and occasionally have the benefit of being able to use the gmail interface remotely and for its search capabilities. However, the gmail interface is just so great that I now use it 99% of the time.

So, considering you get a great web-based email interface + 5GB of email storage for free, I&#039;d definitely recommend using Google Apps over Thunderbird. And for the simpler word &amp; spreadsheet processing, Google Docs is part of the Google Apps package as well, which is great because it allows you to easily share &amp; collaborate with other people within your domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article and all very true. To go a step further &#8211; you mentioned Thunderbird. However, about a month ago, I switched my entire domain name to Google Apps:<br />
<a href="https://www.google.com/a/" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/a/</a><br />
The goal was to use Outlook with IMAP, and occasionally have the benefit of being able to use the gmail interface remotely and for its search capabilities. However, the gmail interface is just so great that I now use it 99% of the time.</p>
<p>So, considering you get a great web-based email interface + 5GB of email storage for free, I&#8217;d definitely recommend using Google Apps over Thunderbird. And for the simpler word &amp; spreadsheet processing, Google Docs is part of the Google Apps package as well, which is great because it allows you to easily share &amp; collaborate with other people within your domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

